Skip to content

California's First MHP Gap NOFA Funds 1,700 Units Before Tax Credits Even Apply

California's First MHP Gap NOFA Funds 1,700 Units Before Tax Credits Even Apply
FundingCalifornia

On August 11, HCD announced nearly $239 million across 20 developments and 1,700 units, awarded through what the department is calling its first-ever Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) Gap Funding NOFA. The mechanics are the real story here: HCD explicitly restricted eligibility to projects that have not yet received tax-exempt bond financing or low-income housing tax credits. This isn't a program layering on top of an already-financed deal -- it's designed to fund the gap that keeps a deal from ever reaching that point.

What a Gap NOFA Actually Solves

Every LIHTC developer knows the sequence problem: a project needs firm financing commitments to be competitive in a CDLAC/CTCAC application, but assembling those commitments -- especially the soft-money layer that closes the gap between hard debt and tax credit equity -- often takes longer than a single funding round allows. HCD's own announcement frames this directly, describing the NOFA as targeting construction funding gaps for projects that are otherwise shovel-ready. If your own deal has stalled specifically because the numbers don't pencil without a soft loan you don't have yet, this is exactly the kind of source EZFeasi's own funding-gap tooling is built to help you identify and size against.

A real, if unstated, implication: a project that lands MHP gap funding walks into its next CDLAC/CTCAC round with one fewer open variable in its sources and uses. That's a genuine competitive advantage in a scored, oversubscribed process -- not just cash, but certainty.

The Real Constraint: Four Months, Not Four Quarters

HCD reports awards went out roughly four months after the NOFA opened in April -- unusually fast for a state gap-funding program, and worth noting for anyone assuming these rounds move at the same pace as a standard 9% cycle. The department attributes the speed to a streamlined review process built specifically for this NOFA, not a permanent change to MHP's normal timeline elsewhere.

For a developer weighing whether to wait for a future round: the practical takeaway isn't the exact number of months, it's that HCD has shown it can move a gap-funding NOFA quickly when the program is purpose-built for it. Whether that holds for a second round is a real open question worth tracking, not something to assume.

Where to Verify This Before It Changes Your Numbers

MHP itself is an existing, established California program (Health & Safety Code Section 50675 et seq.) -- this NOFA is a new funding round under that program's authority, not a new program from scratch. Before building an MHP gap award into a real proforma, confirm directly with HCD whether a second Gap NOFA round is planned and what its eligibility cutoffs are; a state funding announcement is a real signal to start tracking a source, not yet a number to lock into a sources-and-uses table.

Sources

This is EZFeasi’s own analysis of the news below, not the original reporting — read the source for the full story.