Alabama
QAP scoring guide.
Alabama Housing Finance Authority (AHFA) · 2026 QAP
Competitive scoring
Not separately published as a "typical winning score," but the QAP states a hard floor: "Projects with a net score of less than 70 points (Points Gained less Points Lost) will not be considered for allocation" (Addendum A, Project Selection Procedures). Actual competitive/winning scores will run higher than 70 in practice but no historical award-score data is published in the QAP or its addenda.
Select a category to read its scoring criteria.
01Type of Construction
33 pts
02Energy/Water Conservation and Healthy Living Environment
8 pts
03Rent Affordability
16 pts
04Tenant Needs
5 pts
05Project Type
12 pts
06Location
10 pts
07Applicant Characteristics: Minority/Women Participation
5 pts
08Applicant Characteristics: Responsible Owner Experience
5 pts
09Applicant Characteristics: Managing Agent Experience
10 pts
10Points Lost: Non-Compliance / Portfolio Deductions
no maximum (uncapped deduction) pts
Alabama 2027 Housing Credit QAP (Board-approved 6/10/26), Addendum A, "Alabama Housing Finance Authority's 2027 QAP Point Scoring System" (QAP pp. 31-43, internally paginated A-1 through A-13), Section A "Points Gained" and Section B "Points Lost." Threshold requirements at QAP Section II.C (pp. 12-18); tie-breaker and minimum-net-score rules at Addendum A "Project Selection Procedures" (pp. A-1 to A-3).
Tie-breakers
Review the agency’s tie-breaker rules alongside the scoring criteria.
- Fewest aggregate Responsible Owner participations across all applications recommended this cycle
- Priority to applications also applying for HOME Funds
- Priority to projects in tracts with median family income at or above 100% of county AMI
- Priority to the county with fewest total units in active or allocated-but-unplaced AHFA projects
- Priority to owners with no history of required inspections for material non-compliance
- Priority to QCT projects backed by a revitalization plan approved in the last 5 years
- Priority to projects planned for eventual tenant ownership via a homeownership conversion proposal
- Among non-profit owner ties, least aggregate Developer participation across recommended applications
- Public drawing by an impartial drawer in AHFA's boardroom next business day, posted on ahfa.com
Underwriting parameters
Alabama 2026 Housing Credit Qualified Allocation Plan (adopted June 12, 2025), Section II.E.1(iii) "Determination of Financial Feasibility" (pp. 20-22) for DCR/reserves; Section II.F "Developer and Builder Fees" (p. 23); Section I.D "Fees" (pp. 8-10). Supplemented by companion documents published outside the QAP PDF at ahfa.com/multifamily/underwriting and ahfa.com/multifamily/multifamily-notices: "2026 Underwriting Assumptions" (Competitive Cycle Underwriting Updates presentation, dated January 2026) for vacancy rate, max expenses/unit, DSCR, conventional interest rate; "2026 Underwriting Historical Overview" (5-year underwriting data table) for year-over-year trend; and "Multifamily Fees" schedule (revised 12/11/2025) for the full post-award fee schedule.
Utility allowance
Preferred method: No single stated default. Use of the Rural Development or local PHA utility allowance is MANDATORY (not merely preferred) whenever the building/household receives RD assistance, is HUD-monitored, or receives project-based Section 8. Only when none of those triggers apply does the Ownership Entity get to choose among: local PHA schedule, utility-company letter, HUD USM, or a licensed engineer's energy-consumption model (chosen at application and locked until IRS Form(s) 8609 are issued).
None -- AHFA does not publish its own UA calculator/schedule (its DMS "Utility Allowance" screen is a compliance record-keeping entry form, not a UA-computation tool) ↗AHFA Compliance Manual (revised 11-17-25), Section 4.6 "Utility Allowances," pp. 53-56 (duplicated at §§6.22, 8.7, 9.8 for the Bonds/DMS/HOME chapters); the AHFA 2026 QAP (6-12-25, gov-approved) has no utility-allowance section.
