Arizona
QAP scoring guide.
Arizona Department of Housing (ADOH) · 2026-2027 QAP
Competitive scoring
Select a category to read its scoring criteria.
019% Rehabilitation: Project Type
35 pts
029% Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation Work
60 pts
039% Rehabilitation: Project-Based Rental Assistance
40 pts
049% Rehabilitation: CRP / QCT / DDA / Opportunity Zone
10 pts
059% Rehabilitation: Developer's Experience
25 pts
069% New Construction (Rural/Metro) & Tribal: Developer's Experience
25 pts
079% New Construction & Tribal: Supportive Housing
30 pts
089% New Construction & Tribal: Proximity to Amenities
40 pts
099% New Construction & Tribal: CRP / QCT / DDA / Opportunity Zone
10 pts
109% New Construction & Tribal: Below Market Loans and Local Support
25 pts
119% New Construction & Tribal: Senior and Family
20 pts
129% New Construction & Tribal: Energy Efficiency & Heat Mitigation
15 pts
139% New Construction & Tribal: Increase in Extended Use Period or Homeownership
20 pts
149% Tribal Set-Aside Only: LOCCS Balance
25 pts
2026-2027 Arizona QAP, Section V "Selection Criteria" — document pages 19-31, PDF pages 20-32 of https://housing.az.gov/sites/default/files/2025-12/2026-2027_QualifiedAllocationPlan.pdf. Sub-cites: §V.A "4% LIHTC" / PAB Issuance Threshold (unscored, PDF p.20-21); §V.B "9% LIHTC Rehabilitation" scoring (PDF pp.21-24); §V.C "9% LIHTC New Construction (Rural & Metro) & Tribal" scoring (PDF pp.24-31). The 160-point minimum score threshold is at §IV.C.6 (PDF p.20), inside Threshold Eligibility rather than Section V itself.
Tie-breakers
Review the agency’s tie-breaker rules alongside the scoring criteria.
- Greatest number of total LIHTC units
- Lowest average AMI of rent-restricted units, rounded to two decimals
- Longest extended use period
Underwriting parameters
2026-2027 Arizona QAP (adopted/submitted Dec. 1, 2025; Governor-approved), Section VI "Underwriting Standards" — document pages 30–35, PDF pages 31–36 of https://housing.az.gov/sites/default/files/2025-12/2026-2027_QualifiedAllocationPlan.pdf (49-page file). Sub-cites used: §VI.A (9% LIHTC Underwriting — process/timing), §VI.B.1 Pro-Forma (DSCR/vacancy/escalation), §VI.B.2 Operating Expenses, §VI.B.3 Required Reserves, §VI.B.8 Developer Fees, §VI.B.9 Contractor & A/E Fee Maximums; fee schedule at §II.F "ADOH Fees" (document p.10); Bond Issuance Limitation at §V.A (document p.19-20); threshold AMI/score rules at §IV.C.5-6 (document p.19-20).
Utility allowance
Preferred method: None specified for "conventional" LIHTC buildings (owner/agent's free choice among PHA schedule, utility company estimate, HUD USM, or energy consumption model). However, use of the federal program agency's own utility allowance is MANDATORY (not merely preferred) for RD-assisted buildings, buildings with any RD-assisted resident, or HUD-regulated buildings (e.g., project-based Section 8 or HOME) -- this overrides owner choice for all LIHTC units in that building.
ADOH LIHTC Compliance Manual (effective July 1, 2025), §§ 3.12-3.12.4 "Utility Allowance" (pp. 34-35); confirmed via full-text extraction of the current 2026-2027 QAP (49 pages) that the QAP itself contains zero mentions of "utility allowance" -- UA methodology is addressed only in the Compliance Manual, not the QAP.
