Skip to content
STATE LIHTC RESEARCH

Indiana
QAP scoring guide.

Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority (IHCDA) · 2026-2027 QAP

Browse all states ↗
● Verified guideChecked Sep 12, 2026View source QAP ↗
THE POINT TABLE

Competitive scoring

39 categories

Not stated in the QAP or a published scoring summary; IHCDA does not publish per-application scores alongside award announcements. The QAP itself sets 85 of 165 points as the "must clear" score for 9% competitive applications and a case-by-case floor (never below 50 points) for competitive 4%/bond/AWHTC deals — those are stated thresholds, not reported "typical winning" scores.

Select a category to read its scoring criteria.

01

6.1(A) Rent Restrictions

16 pts
Points for committing to rent targeting below the minimum set-aside, scored on % of LIHTC units at or below 30% AMI rent and total % at or below 50% AMI rent (16 pts for 20%/50%, 12 for 20%/40%, 8 for 20%/33%, 4 for <20%/33%). Not scored for competitive 4%/bond/AWHTC applications.
02

6.1(B) Income Restrictions

3 pts
3 points if income restrictions match the elected rent restrictions; mandatory election for the Average Income minimum set-aside. Not scored for competitive 4%/bond/AWHTC applications.
03

6.1(C) Additional Years of Affordability

4 pts
2 points for committing to a 35-year Extended Use Period (15 + 20), 4 points for a 40-year Extended Use Period (15 + 25).
04

6.2(A) Amenities

6 pts
Up to 6 points (2+2+2) for selecting minimum counts/column mixes of amenities from three charts: Common Area, Apartment Unit, and Safety & Security.
05

6.2(B) Accessible or Adaptable Units

5 pts
1/3/5 points for exceeding minimum required percentages of Type A (accessible) or Type B (adaptable) units, tiered by new construction/rehab/age-restricted status.
06

6.2(C) Universal Design Features

5 pts
3/4/5 points for adopting a minimum of 8/9/10 universal design features from each design column, beyond the Part 5.4(F) threshold minimum.
07

6.2(D) Redevelopment of Vacant Structure

6 pts
6 points for fully redeveloping a 100% vacant structure into housing, commercial space, and/or common areas (mutually exclusive with 6.2E and 6.2F).
08

6.2(E) Preservation of Existing Rental Housing

9 pts
4-6 points depending on preservation type (expiring/expired LIHTC project, HUD/USDA-assisted housing, other affordable housing, or market-rate-to-affordable conversion), plus separate bonus points (1-3) scaled to number of units preserved. Mutually exclusive with 6.2D and 6.2F.
09

6.2(F) Infill New Construction

6 pts
6 points for new construction meeting infill site-adjacency and existing-utility-connection criteria. Mutually exclusive with 6.2D and 6.2E.
10

6.2(G) Development is Historic in Nature

3 pts
1-2 points if 25%/50%+ of units are in a nationally/state/locally designated historic building, plus 1 additional point for an approved Part 2 federal historic tax credit application.
11

6.2(H) Foreclosed and Condemned Properties

3 pts
3 points for demolishing/redeveloping or rehabilitating a foreclosed or condemned property covering at least 50% of the development's units.
12

6.2(I) Internet Access

4 pts
Up to 3 points for free high-speed internet in every unit (or including internet in the utility allowance), plus 1 additional point for free common-area Wi-Fi.
13

6.2(J) Lease-Purchase

2 pts
2 points for offering homeownership to qualified tenants after the 15-year Compliance Period via a qualifying lease-purchase structure (single-family/townhome/duplex units only).
14

6.2(K) Building Certification

2 pts
1 point for a base green certification (e.g., LEED Certified, NGBS Bronze) or 2 points for a higher tier (LEED Silver, NGBS Silver, Enterprise Green Communities, Passive House).
15

6.2(L) Onsite Recycling

1 pts
1 point for offering onsite recycling at no cost to residents.
16

6.3(A) Desirable Sites

6 pts
Up to 6 points for proximity to fresh produce (2), positive civic/retail/healthcare land uses (2), and fixed transit (2); minus 1 point per undesirable site within a quarter mile.
17

6.3(B) Unit Production in Areas Underserved by the 9% LIHTC Program

6 pts
Up to 3 points for the local unit of government/unincorporated area going 5/10/15 years without a 9% LIHTC allocation, plus up to 3 points for the same at the county level. 9% applications only.
18

6.3(C) Census Tract without Active Tax Credit Projects

3 pts
3 points if no other active LIHTC project of the same occupancy type exists in the census tract; 1.5 points if exactly one other exists; special preservation carve-out.
19

6.3(D) Opportunity Index

4 pts
1 point each (up to 4) for high-median-income tract, low-poverty tract, low county unemployment, and strong primary-care-physician access; minus 1 point if located in a HUD R/ECAP (waived for Preservation set-aside).
20

6.3(E) Housing Need Index

8 pts
1 point each (up to 8) for meeting housing-need indicators: county population growth, high rent-burden rate, high severe-housing-problem rate, high extreme-low-income renter share, low LIHTC-unit-to-renter-household ratio, pre-1940 housing stock share, low vacant-and-available-unit rate, and age-restricted housing desert designation.
21

6.3(F) 10-Year Projected Job Growth by Economic Growth Region

5 pts
0-5 points on a sliding scale based on the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development's 2022-2032 projected job growth for the development's Economic Growth Region.
22

6.3(G) Five-Year Actual Job Growth Percentage by County

5 pts
0-5 points on a sliding scale based on actual county job growth percentage, 2019-2023 data.
23

6.3(H) Ratio of New Jobs to Housing Permits

3 pts
0-3 points based on net jobs added per new housing permit issued (2014-2023 data); only available if 6.3(G) scored above zero.
24

6.3(I) Community Revitalization Plan for Developments Located in a QCT

2 pts
2 points for a qualifying, sufficiently recent community revitalization plan covering a QCT site where at least 50% of units are within the QCT.
25

6.4(A) Leveraging Capital Resources

4 pts
Up to 4 points on a sliding scale (1.00% to 10.00%+ of total development cost) for firm commitments of non-IHCDA public or private capital funding.
26

6.4(B) Leveraging the READI Program

4 pts
Up to 4 points for being part of an approved IEDC READI regional development plan and receiving READI funds that reduce the need for additional IHCDA gap resources.
27

6.4(C) Non-IHCDA Project-Based Rental Assistance

2 pts
1 point for a committed non-IHCDA project-based rental assistance contract covering at least 10% of units, or 2 points for at least 20% of units.
28

6.4(D) Tax Credit Per Unit / Bond Volume Per Unit

4 pts
Percentile-ranked points (0-4) for the lowest 9% tax credit request per program unit; competitive 4%/bond applications are instead ranked on lowest bond volume per unit.
29

6.5(A) Certified Tax Credit Compliance Specialist

3 pts
Up to 2 points if the Management Entity contact holds an approved compliance certification (C3P, HCCP, TaCCs, NPCC, SHCM, or TCS/TCSA), plus 1 point if the Owner/Developer contact also holds one.
30

6.5(B) Unique Features

3 pts
1-3 points awarded at IHCDA's sole discretion for unique development/resident-benefiting features not already scored elsewhere.
31

6.5(C) Resident Services

5 pts
Up to 5 points (0.5 or 1 point per qualifying service) for committing to onsite resident services across health/wellness, financial capability, workforce development, community/leisure, and children/youth categories.
32

6.5(D) Resident Service Coordinator for Supportive Housing

2 pts
2 points for committing to a dedicated or third-party Resident Service Coordinator working at least 20 hrs/week onsite, available only to Supportive Housing set-aside/Integrated Supportive Housing applicants.
33

6.5(E) Integrated Supportive Housing for Persons Experiencing Homelessness

3 pts
3 points for designating 20-25% of units as supportive housing for persons experiencing homelessness, developed/operated by a team that previously completed the Indiana Supportive Housing Institute.
34

6.5(F) Developments from Previous Supportive Housing Institutes

3 pts
3 points for a Supportive Housing set-aside application tied to a development from the 2024-or-earlier Indiana Permanent Supportive Housing Institute cohort.
35

6.5(G) Eviction Prevention Plan

2 pts
2 points for committing to a qualifying, IHCDA-approved Eviction Prevention Plan with individualized, last-resort eviction practices.
36

6.5(H) Low-Barrier Tenant Screening

4 pts
Up to 2 points for reduced criminal-background screening (misdemeanors and older felonies) and up to 2 points for a reduced prior-eviction look-back window (12 or 6 months).
37

6.5(I) Readiness to Proceed

5 pts
Up to 5 points across readiness indicators: clean Phase I ESA (1), completed Phase II ESA (1), uncommitted non-IHCDA sources ≤10% (1) or ≤5% (2) of total sources, final (not draft) HUD PCNA for rehab deals (1), and a 6-month post-approval closing commitment (1).
38

6.5(J) Owners Who Have Requested Release Through Qualified Contract

-4 pts
Negative points (-2 to -4) if the Applicant/Owner/Developer or a principal has requested a Qualified Contract release (one or multiple projects) or experienced a related foreclosure releasing an extended use period in Indiana after January 25, 2021.
39

6.6(A) Indiana Bond Experience

4 pts
4%/bond applications only: 4 points if the Developer entity has an IRS Form 8609 for a prior Indiana tax-exempt-bond/4% LIHTC deal placed in service within the last 5 years, or 2 points if placed in service 5-10 years ago.
Scoring source

Indiana 2026-2027 QAP (Final v.3), Section 6 "Scoring Criteria," pp. 56-93 (in.gov/ihcda/files/2026-2027-QAP-FINAL-v.3.pdf); set-aside pool percentages from Section 4, p.11; noncompetitive-bond scoring carve-outs from companion Schedule D v.3 §D (in 2026-2027-QAP-Schedules-v16-7.17.26.zip).

WHEN SCORES ARE CLOSE

Tie-breakers

Review the agency’s tie-breaker rules alongside the scoring criteria.

  1. No LIHTC award (4% or 9%) to that community/LUG in the past 3 years
  2. Lowest tax credits per unit (9% apps) or lowest bond volume per unit (4% apps)
  3. Lowest average rent restriction across all units
  4. Highest number of set-asides the application competes under
MODEL ASSUMPTIONS

Underwriting parameters

Indiana 2026-2027 QAP (Final v.3), Part 5.2 "Underwriting Guidelines," pp. 34-37, and Part 5.3 "User Eligibility and Limitations," pp. 38-40 (in.gov/ihcda/files/2026-2027-QAP-FINAL-v.3.pdf). Bond-specific test and fee detail from the companion Schedule D v.3, "Noncompetitive Private Activity Tax-Exempt Bond Financing (25% Test)," Sections B, C and E (in 2026-2027-QAP-Schedules-v16-7.17.26.zip). Fee schedule from QAP Part 7.2, pp. 95-96.

OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS

Utility allowance

Preferred method: No single statewide default. IHCDA imposes a mandatory hierarchy by building/unit funding status: RD-assisted buildings must use the RD-approved UA; HUD-regulated buildings (e.g., Section 8 PBRA) must use the HUD-specific UA; units with HUD tenant-based assistance (Section 8 HCV) must use that PHA's UA schedule. Only buildings outside those categories get to choose freely among: the local PHA's UA schedule, IHCDA's own published county-specific UA schedule, a utility company letter, or a project-specific model (Energy Consumption Model / HUD USM / IHCDA-approved Qualified Engineer Estimate) - the latter three requiring IHCDA pre-approval, a $100 fee, and a 90-day tenant notice period.

IHCDA Utility Allowances (annual county-specific Single-Family and Multi-Family UA schedules, published separately from the QAP) ↗

IHCDA Rental Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Compliance Manual (July 2025), Part 4.4(D) "Approved Utility Allowance Sources," pp. 49-51; the 2026-2027 QAP (Sec. 6.2(I), Internet Access) cross-references this Part 4.4 rather than restating the UA menu itself.

YOUR NEXT STEPS

Development guides for Indiana

Use the LIHTC feasibility checklist →