"We just closed construction financing on our Delaware deal — what does DSHA actually require while we build, and what has to happen before our 8609s get issued?"
The placed-in-service deadline: two paths, both federal-law floors, not a fixed months-from-award clock
DSHA's QAP states the Placed in Service Requirements plainly: "All developments receiving a Preliminary Reservation of credits must be placed in service either by November 1st of the year in which they receive Reservation or must receive a Carryover Allocation of credit prior to the end of the year in which they have received the Preliminary Reservation" (2025-2026 QAP, p.55). Choosing the Carryover path buys time but adds a progress test: the owner must incur more than 10% of reasonably anticipated development costs no more than twelve months after the Carryover Allocation is issued, and "all projects must be placed in service by the end of the second calendar year following the year of allocation" — a direct restatement of the federal floor at IRC §42(h)(1)(E), not a Delaware-specific extension of it.
The QAP requires written CPA certification of the 10% Test "by the close of the calendar year of the allocation or twelve (12) months from the date of the carryover allocation" (p.55) — the QAP's own text gives both reference points rather than a single unambiguous date, so confirm the operative deadline for a specific award with DSHA's Housing Development Section rather than assuming either figure controls. Separately, 4% Credit/tax-exempt bond deals must clear the 50% Test (a minimum of 50% of Aggregate Basis financed by bond proceeds) before permanent closing; DSHA's Guidelines note that failing the 50% Test reduces the eligible basis rather than triggering automatic disqualification.
Missing the deadline isn't automatically fatal: DSHA's Forward Reservation process, at a price
If circumstances beyond the applicant's control threaten the placed-in-service deadline, the QAP gives DSHA sole discretion to allow a return-and-forward-reservation of the same credit amount rather than an outright loss of the allocation. The applicant must notify DSHA within 30 days of learning of the delay, and — if DSHA agrees the delay is outside the applicant's control — must submit written documentation between September 16 and November 1 of the applicable year explaining the due diligence performed, the specific cause of the delay, and the mitigation steps attempted. This path is capped: DSHA will permit a return of credits under this provision "up to two times," at its sole discretion, and any re-application must comply with whatever QAP is current at the time of re-application — not the QAP the deal was originally awarded under.
| Requirement | Detail | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Notice of delay | Within 30 days of the applicant's knowledge of the delay | 2025-2026 QAP, p.56 |
| Written request window | September 16 – November 1 of the applicable year only | 2025-2026 QAP, p.56 |
| Forward Reservation Fee | $15,000 per return request; non-refundable, non-basis-eligible; due before execution | 2025-2026 QAP, p.56; DSHA 2025 Fee Schedule |
| Cap on returns | Up to two times per development, at DSHA's sole discretion | 2025-2026 QAP, p.56 |
| Re-application terms | New application required; must conform to the QAP in effect at re-application, not the original award year's QAP | 2025-2026 QAP, p.56 |
Construction-period oversight: monthly meetings, a sliding retainage scale, and DSHA's own punch-list process
DSHA's Cost Certification and Draw Guide ("the Guide") — not the QAP itself — carries the operational detail. A preconstruction kick-off meeting is held at DSHA's offices within 10 days of construction closing, and DSHA requires "one progress and one draw meeting be held on-site each month" for the life of construction. Draw requests may be submitted monthly, either as a complete package or a pencil copy followed by the complete package within one week; draws submitted later than that window must roll into the following month's draw. The most recently posted edition of the Guide on DSHA's own site is labeled "2020 – 2022 Allocations, Effective as of July 1, 2020" — it is the only Draw and Cost Certification Guide currently linked from DSHA's LIHTC page, but its own title suggests it may predate the 2025-2026 QAP cycle; treat its procedural mechanics (meeting cadence, retainage, punch-list process) as the best available evidence of DSHA's practice, and confirm current fee amounts separately against the 2025-2026 Guidelines.
| Construction milestone | Retainage held | Condition to reduce/release |
|---|---|---|
| Through 50% construction completion | 10% | Standard holdback |
| After 50% completion | 5% | Written contractor request; approval of all lenders and syndicator |
| At submission of draft cost certifications | 2.5% | Contractor's and Mortgagor's draft cost certifications submitted |
| Final release (0%) | 0% | Both cost certifications approved; Working Capital LOC ≥ remaining 2.5%; written approval of all lenders, syndicator, and bonding company |
Final releases of liens are due within 15 business days of final retainage release; a $500-per-day penalty applies for late releases, and permanent conversion will not be scheduled until 30 days after all releases are submitted and approved.
DSHA's own inspection process runs through a punch-list-and-re-walk mechanic rather than fixed quarterly visits: "When work is completed on a building or designated area, DSHA will perform a punch list inspection and will compile a written list of corrections to be completed by the contractor. The second inspection (re-walk) of a given area must be completed within thirty (30) days of the initial walk." A building cannot be occupied until DSHA issues its own letter confirming readiness, independent of any other government approvals. A one-year warranty inspection follows roughly a year after substantial completion; a General Contractor that fails to resolve warranty items within 45 days of that inspection becomes ineligible to bid on future DSHA-financed work until the items are corrected.
Cost certification: an ICPA GAAS audit under DSHA's own Guide, and a genuine fee conflict worth flagging
Delaware runs its own cost-certification framework rather than borrowing another federal program's standard by reference. The QAP requires "cost certification by the owner (mortgagor) and the general contractor," with the certification covering "all sources and uses of funds including all syndication fees" (2025-2026 QAP, p.57). The Guide fills in the audit standard: an Independent Certified Public Accountant (ICPA) — who cannot have an Identity-of-Interest relationship with the mortgagor or contractor, and who is barred from having provided the project's bookkeeping or accounting services in the prior five years — must render "an unqualified opinion addressed to DSHA in a form acceptable to DSHA," prepared "in accordance with generally-accepted auditing standards." A qualified or adverse opinion, or a disclaimer, is not acceptable to DSHA unless fully explained and separately satisfactory to the agency. Notably, the Guide states that "[w]here Government Auditing Standards apply, the ICPA must meet the auditor qualifications of Auditing Standards" — phrasing that makes the federal Yellow Book standard conditional on some triggering fact (most likely a federal-funding threshold under the Single Audit Act) rather than universal to every Delaware Housing Credit cost certification. This research could not confirm exactly what triggers that condition; confirm directly with DSHA before assuming a Yellow Book-level audit is or is not required for a specific deal.
The mortgagor and contractor certify separately, on DSHA Form CC-100 (Mortgagor's Certificate of Actual Cost) and CC-101 (Contractor's Certificate of Actual Cost) respectively, each supported by the ICPA's opinion. Once a completed cost certification is submitted, "no additional costs may be submitted to increase eligible basis," and DSHA will not accept increased costs after that point absent its own request for clarification.
| Source document | Fee amount (per unit) | Due date stated |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-2026 QAP (p.65, "Compliance Monitoring Fee") | $600, plus $250/unit for Average Income projects | Prior to receiving an allocation of credits; at issuance of IRS Form 8609 or the Carryover Agreement, whichever is first |
| 2025-2026 LIHTC Guidelines ("2025 DSHA Fee Schedule") | $750, plus $250/unit for Income Averaging election | No later than construction closing |
| DSHA LIHTC Monitoring and Compliance Manual (Revised Feb. 2024) | $500 (new projects) | Prior to receiving an allocation of credits; at issuance of IRS Form 8609 or the Carryover Agreement, whichever is first |
All three documents are current as of this research (the QAP is dated January 3, 2025; the Guidelines and Compliance Manual carry no later contradicting revision date found). This is a genuine, unresolved conflict in DSHA's own published materials — confirm the operative one-time compliance monitoring fee directly with DSHA's Housing Development Section before budgeting a specific figure.
8609 issuance: building-by-building at placed-in-service, with a 60-day review window
Delaware's Final Closing and 8609 Requirements section states that DSHA "will prepare and issue IRS Form(s) 8609 certifying the final amount of LIHTC allocated to each building in a project at the time the buildings are placed in service" — a building-by-building issuance model, not a single consolidated release held back until every building in a multi-building project reaches completion. DSHA advises that its own review "may take as long as sixty (60) days to complete," and for any project carrying DSHA financing, "Form(s) 8609 will not be issued until permanent closing," regardless of individual buildings' placed-in-service dates. Required submissions include the final DSHA-approved Cost Certification, a Certificate of Occupancy for each building (or, for rehab projects where the municipality doesn't issue COs, substantial-completion documentation), evidence of DSHA loan-closing compliance where applicable, registration on www.destatehousingsearch.org, and confirmation that tenant data has been uploaded to DSHA's database system — DSHA notes this list "is subject to change" and directs owners to confirm the current requirements for each project.
The processing costs behind this are easy to underbudget. Beyond the disputed compliance monitoring fee (above), the QAP-cited Guidelines list a "9% and 4% Tax Credit LIHTC Allocation Fee" of 1.50% of the carryover allocation multiplied by 10 years, due no later than construction closing — a materially different fee mechanic from a flat annual percentage-of-credit charge. A Cost Certification Penalty Fee of $2,500 (charged separately to both the mortgagor and the contractor) applies if cost certification isn't submitted within the Guide's required timeframe, plus an additional $500 for every week it remains outstanding, and a $1,000 fee applies to each additional required review.
Where this goes wrong
- Assuming the placed-in-service deadline is a fixed number of months from the deal's own award date. It is either November 1 of the Preliminary Reservation year, or the end of the second calendar year following the allocation year if a Carryover Allocation is taken — the federal IRC §42(h)(1)(E) floor, not a Delaware-specific benchmark tied to each deal's individual timeline.
- Treating the 10% Test deadline as a single unambiguous date. The QAP itself states the CPA certification is due "by the close of the calendar year of the allocation or twelve (12) months from the date of the carryover allocation" — confirm which one actually controls for a specific award with DSHA directly.
- Assuming a missed placed-in-service deadline automatically forfeits the credit allocation. DSHA's Forward Reservation process can return and re-reserve the same credit amount for circumstances beyond the applicant's control, but only up to two times per development, only within a September 16–November 1 filing window, and only for a $15,000 non-refundable fee.
- Budgeting retainage as a flat 10% held until final completion. DSHA's schedule steps down from 10% to 5% (after 50% completion, with lender/syndicator approval) to 2.5% (at draft cost certification submission) to 0% only once both cost certifications are approved AND the Working Capital Letter of Credit covers the remaining 2.5% AND all lenders/syndicator/bonding company sign off.
- Assuming DSHA's cost-certification audit is a HUD HOME-borrowed standard the way some other states structure it. Delaware runs its own ICPA-audit framework (unqualified GAAS opinion on separate Mortgagor and Contractor certificates, Forms CC-100/CC-101) with Government Auditing Standards applying only conditionally — this research could not confirm the exact trigger for when the stricter Yellow Book standard applies.
- Engaging an ICPA who has provided the project's bookkeeping, accounting, or auditing services within the prior five years. DSHA's Guide treats this as a disqualifying Identity-of-Interest relationship for cost-certification purposes, strictly barring that firm from performing the cost certification, 10% Test, or 50% Test.
- Budgeting a single figure for the one-time Compliance Monitoring Fee without checking which DSHA document it came from. The 2025-2026 QAP says $600/unit, the 2025-2026 Guidelines fee schedule says $750/unit, and the 2024 Compliance Monitoring Manual says $500/unit — three different current DSHA documents, three different numbers.
- Assuming 8609s are withheld until every building in a multi-building project is complete. DSHA's own Core Plan text describes issuance "at the time the buildings are placed in service" — building-by-building — except where DSHA itself has financing in the deal, in which case 8609s wait for permanent closing regardless of individual PIS dates.
- Missing the re-walk window after a punch-list inspection. The second inspection must be completed within 30 days of the initial walk, and DSHA charges a $500 fee for every additional 7 days the re-walk remains outstanding beyond that window.
- Assuming Letters of Credit satisfy DSHA's payment-and-performance bond requirement. The Guidelines are explicit that bonds from an approved bonding company are required before work begins, and that "Letters of Credit are not acceptable to fulfill this requirement."
- HUD
- LIHTC
- State QAPs
- IRS § 42
- Housing Finance Agencies
