Skip to content

Cost, construction type, and the labor package — Kentucky

Phase 6 of 11

"KHC's cost containment table gives me one set of per-unit dollar limits, but the worked example in the Guidelines uses completely different numbers for the same bedroom count — which one actually governs, what are the real GC fee and developer fee caps, and do I need to worry about prevailing wage or Davis-Bacon on this deal?"

Not yet coveredCost containment limits, contractor fee caps, and the developer fee are locked at application and tracked through KHC's underwriting model; energy testing and blower-door verification happen during construction under Chapter 8's inspection process; the owner/contractor agreement, Davis-Bacon and Section 3 contract clauses (where applicable), and the assurance of completion (bond or letter of credit) must all be finalized before KHC issues a notice to proceed. No Kentucky-specific benchmark for how many weeks or months this phase itself takes was located in KHC's materials.

Total development cost limits: a four-way cost containment schedule

KHC's 2026 Cost Containment Limits, "Effective for Applications Submitted On Or After April 23, 2026," set per-unit maximum total development costs split by building type (Elevator vs. Non-Elevator), geography (Urban Areas vs. Balance of State), and bedroom count. "Urban Areas" are defined as Boone, Campbell, Fayette, Jefferson, and Kenton Counties; "[a]ny area outside of the urban counties is considered balance of state."

2026 Cost Containment Limits — New Construction/Rehabilitation (effective for applications submitted on/after April 23, 2026)
Building typeArea0-BR1-BR2-BR3-BR4-BR+
ElevatorUrban$221,570$253,995$308,866$399,575$438,605
ElevatorBalance of State$239,967$275,085$334,512$432,753$475,023
Non-ElevatorUrban$210,539$242,763$292,778$374,767$417,508
Non-ElevatorBalance of State$228,021$262,920$317,088$405,885$452,175

KHC, 2026 Cost Containment Limits. The published table's Historic Rehab/Adaptive Reuse rows extracted blank under both Elevator and Non-Elevator headings — this research could not confirm from the source document whether historic rehab/adaptive reuse shares the New Construction/Rehab figures, carries a separate unpublished limit, or the values simply failed to extract from the PDF. Confirm directly with KHC before assuming either reading.

Flag: the 2027 Multifamily Guidelines include their own worked numeric example of the cost containment calculation — an "11-unit elderly new construction, non-elevator project located in Franklin County" (Balance of State) with "5 one-bedroom units and 6 two-bedroom units," using per-unit limits of $157,805 (1-BR) and $190,316 (2-BR). Those figures do not match the Non-Elevator/Balance of State limits in the 2026 Cost Containment Limits schedule above ($262,920 for 1-BR, $317,088 for 2-BR). The Guidelines' example appears to illustrate the calculation methodology only, using dollar figures from an earlier cost-containment cycle, not the limits currently in effect. Use the 2026 schedule's actual dollar figures for underwriting, not the Guidelines' own worked-example numbers.

Costs tied to a Community Service Facility (in a Housing Credit project located in a Qualified Census Tract) or to commercial space are excluded from the cost containment calculation entirely, but are separately capped: CSF eligible basis cannot exceed 25% of the project's total eligible basis (without any basis boost) and total project development cost cannot exceed $15 million when a CSF is proposed (2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 6).

Contractor fee caps: General Requirements, Overhead, and Profit on a sliding scale

KHC caps General Requirements, Builder's Overhead, and Builder's Profit as percentages of a defined base ("Total Hard Cost – Contingency – (General Requirements, Builder's Overhead and Builder's Profit)"), on a sliding scale tied to total development cost. "Owners are responsible for ensuring that construction contracts do not result in exceeding the maximum fee limits" (Chapter 6, Maximum Allowable Fees).

Maximum allowable contractor fees by total development cost
Total Development CostGeneral RequirementsBuilder's OverheadBuilder's Profit
$250,000 and less6%7%12%
$251,000 - $750,0005%6%8%
$751,000 and greater6%2%6%

2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 6, Maximum Allowable Fees. Construction management fees are included within the General Requirements figure.

Developer fee: tiered per-unit schedule on Credit deals, 20% of TDC on Bond deals

For new construction, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse of 9% Housing Credit and non-credit projects, the developer fee follows a tiered per-unit schedule: "First 15 Units: $28,000 per unit; Next 30 Units (16-45): $23,800 per unit; Next 30 Units (46-75): $16,800 per unit; All Units Over 75: $9,800 per unit," capped at the lesser of that per-unit total or $1,800,000. Consulting fees count as part of the developer fee, and the fee cannot be increased above the amount requested in the initial application.

Tax-Exempt Bond deals use a different formula entirely: "The developer fee on Tax-Exempt Bond projects may not exceed 20% of the total development cost per property, less: a. Developer fee; b. Consultant fee; c. Any fees resembling developer or consulting fees." That fee cannot increase after the full application is submitted, but must be reduced if project costs decrease.

Deferred developer fee has its own repayment window: "the deferred portion must be able to be repaid within the first 10 years of operation, except for Tax-Exempt Bond transactions which may extend the repayment term to the full 15 years allowed by the IRS."

$28,000/unitDeveloper fee — Housing Credit (first 15 units)
$23,800/unitDeveloper fee — Housing Credit (units 16-45)
$16,800/unitDeveloper fee — Housing Credit (units 46-75)
$9,800/unitDeveloper fee — Housing Credit (units over 75)
Lesser of tiered total or $1,800,000Developer fee cap (Housing Credit)
Up to 20% of total development cost per property (net of developer/consultant/similar fees)Developer fee — Tax-Exempt Bond
10 years (Housing Credit) / up to 15 years (Tax-Exempt Bond)Deferred fee repayment window

Mandatory energy performance, not a scored green-building bonus

KHC's Minimum Design Standards (MDS) require, for every project regardless of financing source: energy-code documentation ("Documentation and/or calculations that the building envelope meets or exceeds the applicable energy code requirements must be provided from REScheck or other approved software or methodology"); energy testing following IECC and ASHRAE 62.1/62.2 (or the current International Mechanical Code as adopted by the Kentucky Department of Housing, Buildings and Construction); and blower-door or compartmentalization testing on a sample of units — "a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the units will be selected by KHC for testing up to a one-hundred (100) unit project and five percent (5%) of all units over the one-hundred (100) units." All new and replacement refrigerators, provided dishwashers, clothes washers, range hoods, and exhaust/ceiling fans must be Energy Star qualified, and heat pump/PTHP HVAC systems carry minimum SEER2/EER ratings.

Flag: this research reviewed the 2027-2029 QAP's scoring sections (III and IV) and found no separate, optional, points-scored green-building certification category (e.g., LEED, National Green Building Standard, or Enterprise Green Communities certification) anywhere in that text. Kentucky appears to fold baseline energy performance into a mandatory Minimum Design Standard that every project must meet, rather than offering it as a competitive scoring bonus. If a distinct green-building scoring line exists in a separate KHC scoring workbook document not reviewed for this research, that would contradict this finding — confirm against the current scoring workbook before assuming there is no competitive angle here at all.

No Kentucky state prevailing wage law — but Davis-Bacon still applies through HOME

Kentucky repealed its state prevailing wage law effective January 9, 2017, via House Bill 3, and that repeal was confirmed directly against the U.S. Department of Labor's own current "States without Prevailing Wage Laws" list (dol.gov/agencies/whd/state/prevailing-wages), which lists: "Kentucky – repealed in 2017." There is no Kentucky state prevailing-wage requirement to layer onto a LIHTC construction contract.

Federal Davis-Bacon Act wage rates apply independently of state law, but only when triggered by specific federal funding: "Davis-Bacon Act wage rate requirements apply to contracts for the development of 12 or more HOME-assisted units" (2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 7). KHC's own Guidelines carve out two notable exceptions to that HOME trigger: NHTF funding does not carry the requirement at all ("Davis-Bacon Wage Rate Requirements: Davis-Bacon wage rates do not apply" for NHTF, even though NHTF otherwise mirrors HOME regulations), and Risk-Sharing loans do not trigger it either, because "KHC only offers Risk-Sharing as permanent financing" rather than construction financing, even for projects of 12 or more units.

Wage requirements by funding source
Funding sourceKentucky state prevailing wageFederal Davis-Bacon
State/KHC-only funds (e.g., AHTF, R4R/reserve funding, Housing Credits alone)None — repealed 2017Not independently triggered
HOME (12+ assisted units)None — repealed 2017Applies
HOME (fewer than 12 assisted units)None — repealed 2017Does not apply
NHTFNone — repealed 2017Explicitly does not apply, per KHC Guidelines
Risk-SharingNone — repealed 2017Does not apply — KHC offers Risk-Sharing only as permanent (non-construction) financing

U.S. Dept. of Labor, "States without Prevailing Wage Laws" (confirmed 2026-09-21: "Kentucky – repealed in 2017"); 2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 5 (National Housing Trust Fund; Risk-Sharing) and Chapter 7 ("Davis-Bacon Wage Rates").

Section 3, Build America Buy America, and the construction contract itself

Section 3 reporting applies to "all projects that receive a combined total of $300,000 or more of HUD assistance (including HOME, NHTF, CDBG, etc.)" — a threshold that rose from $200,000 to $300,000 effective March 16, 2026, under HUD's Final Rule at 24 CFR Part 75. Covered projects must track labor hours against two benchmarks: "At least 25% of the total labor hours worked on the project are by Section 3 workers; and... At least 5% of the total labor hours worked on the project are by Targeted Section 3 workers," reporting annually by August 15 during construction and again at project completion.

Build America, Buy America (BABA) requires U.S.-produced iron, steel, construction materials, and manufactured products on "all projects of 5 or more units financed with HOME and/or NHTF funds" (other federal funds, like CDBG, can independently trigger it too). Owners must build the requirement into every procurement document — bid advertisements, contracts, subawards, and purchase orders — and may request a waiver either from KHC directly (for exigent-circumstance or de-minimis/small-grant cases) or from HUD (for product non-availability or unreasonable cost, defined as BABA compliance increasing overall project cost by 25% or more).

The construction contract itself must be either the AIA document or HUD's Construction Contract Form, and must include a Davis-Bacon wage rate clause and a Section 3 clause wherever those requirements apply. KHC requires an assurance of completion once its funds exceed $100,000 and are not disbursed only at project completion — most commonly a payment/performance bond (AIA A-312 or HUD Form 92452) equal to at least 100% of the construction contract amount, required outright "if KHC is providing a bridge or construction loan, or for Risk-Sharing loans in which insured advances are provided," or alternatively an irrevocable letter of credit equal to at least 30% of KHC funds.

Where this goes wrong

  • Using the 2027 Multifamily Guidelines' own worked cost-containment example dollar figures ($157,805/1-BR, $190,316/2-BR) as if they were current — they don't match the 2026 Cost Containment Limits schedule effective April 23, 2026 and appear to be stale illustrative figures.
  • Assuming the Historic Rehab/Adaptive Reuse cost containment limits equal the New Construction/Rehab figures — the published schedule's Historic Rehab/Adaptive Reuse rows were blank in this research and were not independently confirmed either way.
  • Applying a single General Requirements/Overhead/Profit percentage across an entire project without checking which total-development-cost tier applies — the caps step down materially (Builder's Overhead drops from 7% to 2%) as TDC crosses $250,000 and $751,000.
  • Using the Housing Credit tiered per-unit developer fee schedule on a Tax-Exempt Bond deal, or vice versa — Bond deals use a flat 20%-of-TDC formula net of developer/consultant fees, not the per-unit tiers.
  • Assuming a deferred developer fee always has a full 15 years to repay — that extended window applies only to Tax-Exempt Bond transactions; Housing Credit-only deals are limited to 10 years.
  • Assuming Kentucky's lack of a state prevailing wage law means no wage floor ever applies — federal Davis-Bacon still applies independently whenever a deal crosses 12 or more HOME-assisted units.
  • Assuming Davis-Bacon applies to every KHC funding source the way it applies to HOME — KHC's own Guidelines explicitly exempt NHTF and Risk-Sharing (as permanent-only financing) from the requirement.
  • Assuming the QAP's own scored selection criteria include a green-building certification bonus — this research found none in the QAP's scoring sections; energy performance is instead a mandatory Minimum Design Standard applying to every project.
  • Using the old $200,000 Section 3 threshold — it rose to $300,000 for projects effective March 16, 2026.
  • Treating BABA as HOME-only — it also applies to NHTF-funded projects of 5 or more units, and other federal funding sources like CDBG can independently trigger it.

At a glance

Cost containment schedule effective date
April 23, 2026 (applications submitted on/after that date)
Urban Areas (cost containment)
Boone, Campbell, Fayette, Jefferson, and Kenton Counties; all other counties are Balance of State
GR/OH/Profit caps (TDC ≥$751,000)
General Requirements 6% / Builder's Overhead 2% / Builder's Profit 6%
Developer fee — Housing Credit deals
Tiered per-unit ($28,000 → $23,800 → $16,800 → $9,800/unit by unit-count tier), capped at $1,800,000
Developer fee — Tax-Exempt Bond deals
Up to 20% of total development cost per property
Deferred fee repayment window
10 years (Housing Credit) / up to 15 years (Tax-Exempt Bond)
CSF eligible basis cap
25% of total eligible basis; $15 million total project development cost cap when a CSF is proposed
Kentucky state prevailing wage law
Repealed effective January 9, 2017 (House Bill 3); confirmed on U.S. DOL's current list of states without prevailing wage laws
Federal Davis-Bacon trigger
HOME-assisted projects of 12 or more units; does not apply to NHTF or to Risk-Sharing (permanent-financing only)
Section 3 threshold (current)
$300,000 or more of combined HUD assistance, effective March 16, 2026 (raised from $200,000)
Section 3 labor-hour benchmarks
≥25% of hours by Section 3 workers; ≥5% by Targeted Section 3 workers
BABA applicability
HOME/NHTF-funded projects of 5 or more units (other federal funds may independently trigger it)
Blower-door/compartmentalization testing sample
10% of units (up to 100-unit projects) / 5% of units (over 100 units), KHC-selected

Governing authority

  • 2026 Cost Containment Limits table and Urban Area county listKentucky Housing Corporation, 2026 Cost Containment Limits (effective for applications submitted on/after April 23, 2026)
  • Worked cost-containment example (flagged as inconsistent with current schedule)2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 6, "Cost Containment"
  • Maximum allowable contractor fees (General Requirements, Overhead, Profit)2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 6, "Maximum Allowable Fees"
  • Developer fee schedules and deferred fee repayment terms2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 6, "Developer Fee," "Developer Fee – Tax-Exempt Bond Projects," "Deferred Developer Fee"
  • Community Service Facility basis/cost caps2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 6, Requirements for Underwriting, item 12
  • Mandatory energy code documentation, energy testing, blower-door sampling, Energy Star appliance requirementsKentucky Housing Corporation, Minimum Design Standards, MultiFamily (FINAL 2026.0330)
  • Absence of a green-building scoring category2027-2029 QAP, Sections III-IV (New/Existing Supply Selection Criteria) — reviewed in full; no green-building scoring line found
  • Kentucky's 2017 prevailing wage repealU.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, "States without Prevailing Wage Laws" (dol.gov/agencies/whd/state/prevailing-wages), confirmed 2026-09-21; House Bill 3 (2017 Ky. Acts)
  • Davis-Bacon trigger and NHTF/Risk-Sharing exemptions2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 5 (National Housing Trust Fund; Risk-Sharing Program Requirements) and Chapter 7 ("Davis-Bacon Wage Rates")
  • Section 3 threshold and benchmarks2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 7, "Section 3 Reporting"; 24 CFR Part 75
  • Build America, Buy America requirements and waiver process2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 7, "Build America, Buy America (BABA)"; Pub. L. 117-58; 2 CFR 184
  • Construction contract form, wage/Section 3 clauses, assurance of completion2027 Multifamily Guidelines, Chapter 8, "Documents Required Prior to the Start of Construction"

See this phase modeled on your own site

Book a demo and we'll walk through it live, or get a quote for your team.